South African measures to restrict cycad trade inadequate
25 February 2011 | News story
A proposal published for public comment could result in trade in 11 species of native cycad trees being brought to a halt by authorities in South Africa, and trade in others restricted.
But TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, a joint programme of IUCN and WWF, says the measures don’t go far enough and is calling on the South African authorities to introduce a blanket trade ban on cycads.
“While the South African government is to be applauded for considering action against the illicit trade in cycads, TRAFFIC is concerned that the measures simply won’t stop the wild extinction of yet more cycad species,” says David Newton of TRAFFIC East and Southern Africa.
Cycad species affected are those in the genus Encephalartos, several of which are commonly known as bread palms or bread trees because their stems can be used to prepare a bread-like starchy food.
“Cycads are among the oldest living seed plants, but are today are among the most highly threatened groups of species. South Africa is a global hotspot for cycads, and 31% of the country’s species are classified as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™, principally because of severe over-harvesting to supply private horticultural collections,” says Simon Stuart, Chair of IUCN's Species Survival Commission.
IUCN classifies around 70% of Encephalartos species in Africa as threatened with extinction - four species no longer exist in the wild. All Encephalartos species are listed in Appendix I of CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna) , which precludes their international commercial trade. However, trade in artificially propagated plants from South Africa is still permitted, and despite existing regulations to restrict trade, including new CITES regulations promulgated in 2010, the plunder of wild cycad populations has continued.
According to the CITES trade database, over 5,000 cycad plants (Encephalartos species) were reported as exports from South Africa in 2009 alone. All were reported to be artificially propagated.
“Even just monitoring that number of exports to ensure they are all cultivated plants and not illegally wild-sourced is a massive challenge,” says Newton.
He also points out inconsistencies in the government’s proposals, such as no requirement for Critically Endangered cycad species under a certain size to be microchipped, unlike less threatened species.
According to Newton, the proposed new rules would do little to improve regulation of the international trade in cycads. “The South Africa government recently delisted Abalone (a type of mollusc) from CITES because they were unable to meet the CITES export inspections requirements for farmed Abalone. So why do they now think they will be able to inspect and monitor size limited cycad exports, as proposed in the government gazette, given they have been unable to do so in the past?”
Under CITES rules, the Scientific Authority in South Africa would have to demonstrate what levels of plants could be traded without posing a conservation risk. Such a study is known as a Non-Detriment Finding (NDF), but these have not yet been completed for all South Africa’s cycads.
“TRAFFIC calls on the South African government to impose a complete ban on the export of cycads until the completion of non-detriment findings and the establishment of biodiversity management plans that will ensure their correct management by all stakeholders,” says Newton. “This drastic measure is now required given the poor management of this trade over the years and the fact that an increasing number of cycad taxa are becoming extinct in the wild.”
In December 2010 the European Union imposed a ban on trade in cycad species from South Africa.
For more information, please contact:
Richard Thomas, Global Communications Co-ordinator, TRAFFIC, t + 44 1223 279068, m +44 752 6646216, email@example.com
Nicki Chadwick, Media Relations Officer, IUCN, t +41 22 999 0229, m +41 79 528 3486,firstname.lastname@example.org